At the moment councils collect council tax and business rates. Broadly speaking, councils keep the council tax but pass the business rates back to Central Government. Central government then gives some of that back to councils as government grants
George Osbourne has announced today that in the future councils will be allowed to keep all business rates from their area. This is going to be a massive change for councils and gives us lots to think about.
Here’s a few early thoughts:
This obviously gives councils great incentives to attract businesses to their areas
It’s not clear yet how the money will be shared out between County Councils and District Councils. Will Parish councils get anything?
It will encourage councils to work harder to promote their town centres – and might discourage councils from increasing car parking charges
It all fits in with the recent discussions about having a combined Essex Authority to attract business and infrastructure. If this goes ahead, it will encourage Essex Councils to pool business rates and to work together – so that if there is a new business park in Essex, all councils might benefit?
Business rates do hit some small businesses very hard but rents can hit them very high as well!
Why should we see this as a positive ? – do you have confidence in ECC ( ie:pot holes/ street lighting )or even trust RDC (ie: Planning / Infrastructure ) to implement this for the benefit of the electorate ? – I don’t.
The vested interest / private ownership cartels will be the beneficeries not us.
A case of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer.. Deprived areas will not get the income that thriving business areas will receive ,and with no central support will never aspire . In principle a good idea but will have to have an ” income support ” type system and we all know how popular that is with the present regime!!!
Please log in again.
The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.
onlineFOCUS uses cookies to make the site run more smoothly for you.. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRejectRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Beware Greeks bearing gifts! Or even Georges!
Why should we see this as a positive ? – do you have confidence in ECC ( ie:pot holes/ street lighting )or even trust RDC (ie: Planning / Infrastructure ) to implement this for the benefit of the electorate ? – I don’t.
The vested interest / private ownership cartels will be the beneficeries not us.
A case of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer.. Deprived areas will not get the income that thriving business areas will receive ,and with no central support will never aspire . In principle a good idea but will have to have an ” income support ” type system and we all know how popular that is with the present regime!!!
Just how much will Santa George cut next year’s local authority grant to make up for the loss of income to the treasury for this?