{"id":1274,"date":"2008-08-18T18:30:36","date_gmt":"2008-08-18T17:30:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/?p=1274"},"modified":"2008-08-18T23:44:52","modified_gmt":"2008-08-18T22:44:52","slug":"next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/","title":{"rendered":"Coral, Chequers and Ferry Road Applications Recommended For REFUSAL, Rayleigh Lanes Scheme down for APPROVAL"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Development Control Committee meets next Thursday August 28th, with four schemes up for discussion. You can download the agenda here.<\/a><\/p>\n

Here is a summary of the officers recommendations:<\/p>\n

1. Convert the “Chequers” Inn at Canewdon into Flats and Bungalows.<\/strong>
\nRecommended for refusal for the following reasons:<\/p>\n

1 The proposal would result in an over development of the site failing to provide sufficient private amenity space for the flats and bungalows proposed. If allowed the development would provide insufficient private amenity space for sitting out, limited open storage, drying and limited recreation for future occupiers of those dwellings detrimental to the expectations those future occupiers ought reasonably expect to enjoy.<\/p>\n

2 The proposed bungalows by reason of their design are considered to be inappropriate and unsympathetic to the Conservation Area, ignoring the established character of the area. Bungalows of hipped slated roofs and white rendered walls are considered to be more suitable. The proposal is therefore considered to be contrary to Policy BC1 of the Rochford District Replacement Local Plan (2006).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

2. Demolish one house in Ferry Road Hullbridge and replace with 17 Flats:<\/strong>
\nThe only reason for refusal put forward by officers is that according to council policy, the scheme should include 3 affordable homes and it doesn’t yet do so, although negotiations are continuing with a housing association.
\nThe officers therefore put forward two alternative recommendations:<\/p>\n

RECOMMENDATION 1
\n2.52 Should the agreement required to achieve the provision of affordable housing not be completed by midnight 8th September 2008 that the Head of Planning and Transportation be delegated to REFUSE planning permission for the following reason:-
\n1. The proposal and details accompanying the application fail to make provision for affordable housing contrary to the advice contained at paragraph 29 to Planning Policy statement 3 Housing (2006) and Policy HP8 to the Rochford District Replacement Local Plan (2006). If allowed the development of the site as proposed would see the loss of an opportunity to provide affordable housing and the effective use of land in accord with national and local Planning Policy.<\/p>\n

RECOMMENDATION 2
\n2.53 On the basis that the agreement required to achieve the provision of affordable housing is completed on or before midnight 8th September 2008 the committee is recommended to resolve to APPROVE the application subject to the applicants and owners entering into an AGREEMENT under section 106 of the act to secure in perpetuity the provision of not less than three units for affordable purposes…<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

3. Application by Project Coral for a three storey mixed use building at the front of the Asda site.
\n<\/strong>
\nThe officers make the following comments :<\/p>\n

em>Principle of the development
\n3.28 The principle of the proposed development accords with the local plan allocation seeking a mixed use development and although submitted for separate consideration to the outline permission does however follow the general scope of the expectations for the site including the provision of residential flats above the ground floor commercial units found acceptable by the permission granted under application 04\/00975\/FUL…….<\/p>\n

……CONCLUSION
\n3.48
\nThe proposed building is of a comparable design and appearance to a similar building previously allowed on appeal. The changes to the siting and size of the building are minor and given the setting of the building would not prove harmful to the character and appearance of the area.<\/p>\n

3.49
\nThe proposal however introduces a considerable number of flats to the upper floors above commercial uses to ground floor that whilst giving life and vitality out of hours would have no amenity space or sufficient car parking necessary to meet the reasonable expectations of those future occupiers.<\/p>\n

3.50
\nThe applicant seeks to achieve consent for a wide range of commercial uses that serve the local community in the range of services that would be provided. However, no information is provided as to how the variety of uses might be secured in perpetuity. Control would be rested with the landlord and could lead to a domination of particular uses effectively by-passing controls by statute that is in place to address community acceptability.<\/p>\n

3.51
\nThe proposal includes sufficient numbers of flats such that provision should be made for affordable housing. Although the applicant makes a case for no provision in view of provision on the greater site elsewhere, nonetheless accepts that the provision of at least three units is required. No particulars or agreement have been submitted to achieve this as part of the consideration of the application<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The scheme is recommended for refusal by officers for the following reasons:<\/p>\n

3.52 It is proposed that this committee RESOLVES to REFUSE the application for the following reasons:-
\n1 The proposal by way of the lack of any garden or amenity space to serve the flats proposed would result in an unsatisfactory form of development lacking space to provide external storage, drying and limited outdoor recreation to serve the needs of future occupiers of the flats proposed. If allowed the proposal would result in a poor quality form of residential accommodation contrary to Policies HP6, HP11 and HP17 to the Rochford District Replacement Local Plan (2006) proving detrimental to the amenity that future occupiers of the flats ought to reasonably expect to enjoy.<\/p>\n

2 The proposal does not provide sufficient parking within the site for the residential part of the proposal. The lack of parking within the site may well lead to vehicles being parked within the highway, causing obstruction to other road users to the detriment of general highway safety. The proposal would therefore be contrary to Policy 1.1 (Safety) and Policy P7 (parking standards) Appendix G: Development Control Policies and Processes, Essex Local Transport Plan 2006 \/2011.<\/p>\n

3 The proposal by way of the wide range in uses sought in perpetuity would fail to secure a sufficient guarantee that a range of uses would be retained to serve day to day needs of local residents or would not give rise to noise, disturbance or increased traffic beyond which the Local Planning Authority should not give up statutory responsibility for the consideration of the future range of uses in the wider interests of serving the local community in this area. If allowed the proposal would effectively undermine Policy SAT6 to the Rochford District Replacement Local Plan (2006) to the detriment of the vitality and attractiveness of the local parade and neighbourhood centre and to the detriment of amenity adjoining residents ought reasonably expect to enjoy.<\/p>\n

4 The proposal and details accompanying the application fail to make provision for affordable housing contrary to the advice contained at paragraph 29 to Planning Policy Statement 3 Housing (2006) and Policy HP8 to the Rochford District Replacement Local Plan (2006). If allowed the development of the site as proposed would see the loss of an opportunity to provide affordable housing and the effective use of land in accordance with national and local Planning Policy.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n


\n4. Redevelop the top of the Rayleigh Lanes building into flats (which would mean the loss of the Snooker Club)<\/strong>
\nThe officers recommend approval for the following reasons:<\/p>\n

\n4.22
\nWhilst it is acknowledged that the scheme if approved would result in the loss of the snooker club that currently occupies the first floor, there are other facilities of a similar nature located close by at Nos.106-108High Street….<\/p>\n

……CONCLUSION
\n4.33
\nThe application offers the opportunity to increase the number of people living within the town centre through the provision of a scheme that is both sustainable and that also affords a rare opportunity to enhance the character of the Conservation Area.
\n4.34
\nWhilst concerns regarding the lack of parking provision are noted it is felt that given the town centre location of the application site, the close proximity of the public car park opposite and the general level of car parking provision within the town centre that lack of on-site parking is not of sufficient to justify a refusal of planning permission.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Development Control Committee meets next Thursday August 28th, with four schemes up for discussion. You can download the agenda here. Here is a summary of the officers recommendations: 1. Convert the “Chequers” Inn at Canewdon into Flats and Bungalows. Recommended for refusal for the following reasons: 1 The proposal would result in an over […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[24,10,5,1,13,4],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"\nCoral, Chequers and Ferry Road Applications Recommended For REFUSAL, Rayleigh Lanes Scheme down for APPROVAL - onlineFOCUS<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Coral, Chequers and Ferry Road Applications Recommended For REFUSAL, Rayleigh Lanes Scheme down for APPROVAL - onlineFOCUS\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Development Control Committee meets next Thursday August 28th, with four schemes up for discussion. You can download the agenda here. Here is a summary of the officers recommendations: 1. Convert the “Chequers” Inn at Canewdon into Flats and Bungalows. Recommended for refusal for the following reasons: 1 The proposal would result in an over […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"onlineFOCUS\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/rayleighlibdems\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-18T17:30:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2008-08-18T22:44:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#\/schema\/person\/4a5efa4ae50eba03fbb35a72481d3282\"},\"headline\":\"Coral, Chequers and Ferry Road Applications Recommended For REFUSAL, Rayleigh Lanes Scheme down for APPROVAL\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-18T17:30:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2008-08-18T22:44:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/\"},\"wordCount\":1286,\"commentCount\":23,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Asda or Makro\",\"Canewdon & Around\",\"Hullbridge\",\"No Category\",\"Planning Applications\",\"Rayleigh\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/\",\"name\":\"Coral, Chequers and Ferry Road Applications Recommended For REFUSAL, Rayleigh Lanes Scheme down for APPROVAL - onlineFOCUS\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-18T17:30:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2008-08-18T22:44:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Coral, Chequers and Ferry Road Applications Recommended For REFUSAL, Rayleigh Lanes Scheme down for APPROVAL\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/\",\"name\":\"onlineFOCUS\",\"description\":\"News and Stuff for Rochford District From Your Local Liberal Democrats - since 2003.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#organization\",\"name\":\"onlineFOCUS\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.onlinefocus.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/libdem260.gif?fit=260%2C204&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.onlinefocus.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/libdem260.gif?fit=260%2C204&ssl=1\",\"width\":260,\"height\":204,\"caption\":\"onlineFOCUS\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/rayleighlibdems\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#\/schema\/person\/4a5efa4ae50eba03fbb35a72481d3282\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/686f395a29c64aae72a758d25879524e?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/686f395a29c64aae72a758d25879524e?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Coral, Chequers and Ferry Road Applications Recommended For REFUSAL, Rayleigh Lanes Scheme down for APPROVAL - onlineFOCUS","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Coral, Chequers and Ferry Road Applications Recommended For REFUSAL, Rayleigh Lanes Scheme down for APPROVAL - onlineFOCUS","og_description":"The Development Control Committee meets next Thursday August 28th, with four schemes up for discussion. You can download the agenda here. Here is a summary of the officers recommendations: 1. Convert the “Chequers” Inn at Canewdon into Flats and Bungalows. Recommended for refusal for the following reasons: 1 The proposal would result in an over […]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/","og_site_name":"onlineFOCUS","article_publisher":"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/rayleighlibdems","article_published_time":"2008-08-18T17:30:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2008-08-18T22:44:52+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Estimated reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#\/schema\/person\/4a5efa4ae50eba03fbb35a72481d3282"},"headline":"Coral, Chequers and Ferry Road Applications Recommended For REFUSAL, Rayleigh Lanes Scheme down for APPROVAL","datePublished":"2008-08-18T17:30:36+00:00","dateModified":"2008-08-18T22:44:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/"},"wordCount":1286,"commentCount":23,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Asda or Makro","Canewdon & Around","Hullbridge","No Category","Planning Applications","Rayleigh"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/","url":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/","name":"Coral, Chequers and Ferry Road Applications Recommended For REFUSAL, Rayleigh Lanes Scheme down for APPROVAL - onlineFOCUS","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-18T17:30:36+00:00","dateModified":"2008-08-18T22:44:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/next-weeks-planning-meeting-coral-chequers-and-ferry-road-applications-recommended-for-refusal-rayleigh-lanes-scheme-down-for-approval\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Coral, Chequers and Ferry Road Applications Recommended For REFUSAL, Rayleigh Lanes Scheme down for APPROVAL"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/","name":"onlineFOCUS","description":"News and Stuff for Rochford District From Your Local Liberal Democrats - since 2003.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#organization","name":"onlineFOCUS","url":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.onlinefocus.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/libdem260.gif?fit=260%2C204&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.onlinefocus.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/libdem260.gif?fit=260%2C204&ssl=1","width":260,"height":204,"caption":"onlineFOCUS"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/rayleighlibdems"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#\/schema\/person\/4a5efa4ae50eba03fbb35a72481d3282","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/686f395a29c64aae72a758d25879524e?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/686f395a29c64aae72a758d25879524e?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/"]}]}},"modified_by":"admin","jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1274"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1274"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1274\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.onlinefocus.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}