Assume this is some sort of retrospective application then? This makes a mockery of planning laws. Or is it actually true that possession is 9/10ths of the law! Why hasn’t enforcement action been taken against this “illegal” site and the occupants evicted? Reply
Admin,
Isn’t GT1 were the existing “Travellers” site is opposite the Garden centre?
Yes!
Assume this is some sort of retrospective application then? This makes a mockery of planning laws.
Or is it actually true that possession is 9/10ths of the law!
Why hasn’t enforcement action been taken against this “illegal” site and the occupants evicted?