Drainage and Dogma

The blocking of a ditch helped cause flooding in Down Hall Road...

Chris Black writes:

District Councillors had a training session today on sustainable drainage systems- the systems  you need to cope with the run-off of water from new developments. I’m grateful for the County Council officer, Mr Simpson, from driving from the other end of Essex to talk to us – and respond positively to some stern questioning.

Flooding and drainage are big issues for our area, and councillors need to ensure the proper schemes are installed. But it’s clear from the training session that there’s another problem. When these systems are installed, the developer usually passes them onto another company to maintain them – and that company could be based hundreds of miles away. There’s nothing to stop the responsibility being passed onto other companies in years to come. How on earth do you ensure that they are being properly maintained in 20, 40 or 60 years time?

The problem is the modern dogma of privatising everything. Things would be simpler, and safer, if developers paid a dowry to the District or County Council, and that council took them over. Or a council could set up an arms-length company to maintain them.

This isn’t a perfect solution – the County Council sometimes isn’t very good at maintaining its existing ditches, as in the picture below!  But at least for the decades to come we would know who could be held accountable, instead of maybe trying to contact some obscure property company hundreds or thousands of miles away.

 

 

Leave a Reply

3 Comments on "Drainage and Dogma"

Notify of
avatar
trackback

[…] Of course, in theory, well-designed schemes should relieve flooding, but as Cllr Chris Black discusses in this article, the design on its the own is not […]

Jim
Guest

So, in essence, the Sustainable Urban Drainage Schemes ( SUDS ) is not a ‘sustainable’ solution – whereas not
building anywhere near known flood plain would be; exactly when does common sense kick in with our ‘Planners’?.

Example to illustrate Admin’s point above ( out-sourcing / selling on / copping out by Developer’s ) –
About 12 years ago properties were built in Hawkwell and involved a Retention Pond ( part of the drainage scheme )
it was’nt properly maintained and, after just 5 years , overflowed and flooded 5 homes ( badly ) …..I rest my case your honour!!!.

James Newport
Guest

and so unless maintenance can be ‘guaranteed’ – you are up the creek without a paddle

wpDiscuz